The Human Resource Practices-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Choose two of the following HR Practices and Explain how Cultural differences may have an Impact. Answer: Introduction Currently, International human resource management is a key aspect for consideration for the multi-national companies. Different nations have different cultures, political states and social-economic positions which affect the businesses in many different ways. Thus, application of one of the human resource management practice in one country may produce different results when applied to another nation. Therefore, unlike the domestic human resource management, it is hard to manage human resource at a global level which necessitates the application of strategies that are likely to handle these differences in the nations (Kundu, Divya Pardeep, 2007). The USA is a federal state that is made up of fifty states, five governing territories and also a federal district. USA has over 324 millions of people living I these states which cover about 9.8 million square kilometers. It country ranks the third in the world by total area. It has one of the most powerful economies in the world. On the other hand, India is a south Asian country with federal governance, large enough at position seven in the world by area. Currently, India is one of the word's fastest growing economies. Amazon has ventured into both USA and India and currently active in these countries (Chow, Huang, Liu, 2008). Recruitment is one of the key aspects of the organization that must be handled with care. When done at international level, the agencies involved usually take appropriate strategies for effectiveness. Internationally, recruitment can be done at parent country nation, host country or third country nation (Birasnav Rangnekar, 2009). On the other hand, career development entails all the activities that are involved in developing the skills and experiences that are required to help one handle both the current and the future career roles. People in different nations develop their careers differently due to different cultures (Adnan, Abdullah, Ahmad, 2011). The purpose of this report is to bring out the differences that exist in various aspects of the international human resource due to differences in culture of the countries under consideration. It establishes how Amazon recruitment and selection is done differently by Amazon and India due to the cultural differences that exist between the two countries. Also, the essay targets to establish the differences that exist in the career development as one of the aspects of the international human resource. Therefore, this essay exposes the international human resource management differences that exist in different countries due to differences in cultural contexts. Recruitment and Selection Recruitment refers to the process through which a given company uses to identify, screen, shortlist and hire the potential right people to take up job vacancies in a given organization. It is a very critical step in the every organization and must be done with minimum mistakes to get the best skill and talent for the organization. It entails all the activities that are undertaken to attract, select and get the potential candidates that who have the right qualifications to take up the job positions in the organization (Absar, 2012). Selection entails the activities that are undertaken to identify the most qualified people from those that have been attracted for a given job position in the organization. Selection can be done through interviews, checking in the referees and also testing them. Recruitment and selection have a different perception at the international level. Amazon being of the multinational organizations employs different recruitment and selection strategies (Zhu, Warner Rowley, 2007). The way the organization conducts recruitment and selection in one country is different from the other. This is because the recruitment strategies employed in one country cannot necessarily yield fruits in the other country. This fact is attributed to the fact that different nations have different cultural dimensions (Deloitte, 2011). Comparing the recruitment at USA and India, there are differences and similarities that come out. India is one of the countries with high uncertainty index according to Hofstedes cultural dimension, the state adopted strategies that emphasize on testing and monitoring the processes of recruitment. The process is profoundly influenced by the traditional management. This is different from the USA which has a low uncertainty index. These differences make the force organizations that operation in USA and India to employ different strategies to conduct recruitment and selection. Amazon as a multinational company operates in both countries and has employed different strategies in the two countries for effective management of the human resource of the organization. Also, India is a high power distance country. Thus there is a lot of emphasis on the connections rather than recruitment and selection (Effron and Shanley, 2011). This is different from the USA which is a low power distance country that emphasizes on the advertising, recruiting and selection. Therefore, the cultural differences in cultural dimensions between the USA and India bring about differences in recruitment and selection processes (Gusdorf, 2008). Career Management Career management is defined as a continuous learning process that entails planning and the shaping of the individuals in acquiring the skills that are necessary for the helping an employee to achieve the future goals and expectations of the career market. Career management is a human resource practice that demands the contribution of both the employer and the employees themselves (Benko and Weisberg, 2007). The employee needs to do self-assessment and make efforts to work towards achieving the future market goals and expectations in the field. Different countries have different ways in which people manage their careers depending on the prevailing nations culture (Cheese, 2008). Usually, career management entails three main steps that guide an individual to grow in their lines. Firstly, there must be career planning which is the process of identifying the goals that need to be achieved (Bharathi, 2009). It entails self-assessment practices that helps one know their interests and the development needs and analyzing the strengths and weaknesses in ones life. Secondly, there is career channeling where one identifies the routes in the career to follow depending on the goals. The last step is career development which is a continuous process throughout one's life. The organization plays a critical role in the career management of a given employee because of their support (Benett, 2013). The role of the organization in the career of employees in India and the US has various similarities and differences in the two nations. Usually, the companies consider training and development, mentoring programs, lateral growth and the performance evaluation. India offers minimal training and development to its employees, unlike the US which advocates for pieces of training and believes that it is a way to help employees and increase productivity in the organization (Singh Mohanty, 2011). Also, India has little emphasis on the mentoring programs for its employees as compared to the USA which has promoted these programs to help its employees increase the career management. Regarding the performance evaluation, both countries advocate practice this aspect as a way to establish the level of productivity and effectiveness of the employees in the organizations (Warner, 2008). It is evident that a similar organization running business in the USA and India is forced to differently handle the career management as one of functions of the human resource in business. Amazon is a player in both the US and India. The career management practices that company employs in India is totally different from that it uses in the US. This is mainly because of the two countries have different cultural dimesions. Conclusion In conclusion, the international human resource has various aspects that need to be considered for effectiveness. Multinational companies find challenges in the practices that they should employ in the subsidiaries operating in different nations. This is mainly because similar practices yield different results when applied in the various countries. Recruitment and selection in India and USA depict differences in the way they are done. Also, career management as one of the aspects of human resource is done differently in the two countries, and only a few similarities exist in practice. The explanation for the differences in the international human resource management practices is greatly attributed to the cultural differences that exist among various countries. According to Hofstedes cultural dimensions, states have varied aspects of culture which is the primary cause of the differences in business activity practices that exist. Therefore, the prevailing culture, political state, and social, economic positions have influence not only recruitment and career development but also on the entire organizations human resource practices of the organization in different countries. References Absar M. (2012). Recruitment and the Selection practices in the Manufacturing Firms in Bangladesh. The Indian journal of Industrial Relations, 436-448. Adnan, Z., Abdullah, H. Ahmad, J. (2011). "Direct Influence of the Human Resource Management Practices on the Financial Performance of Malaysian RD Companies," World Review of Business Research, 1(3), 61-77. Benett, A. (2013). The Talent Mandate: Why smart companies put people first. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. Benko, C. and Weisberg, A. (2007). Mass Career Customization: Aligning workplace with today's non?traditional workforce. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston Bharathi N. (2009). Employees Engagement Practices In the Spinning Mills- An Empirical Study," Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, Vol. 2:4 Birasnav, M. Rangnekar, S. (2009). "Structure of human capital enhancing the human resource management practices in India" International Journal of Business and Management; 4(5): 226-238 Cheese, P. (2008). Driving high performance in the talent powered organization. Strategic HR Review, 7(4). Chow, I., Huang, J., Liu, S. (2008). "Strategic HRM in China: Configurations and the Competitive Advantage," Human Resource Management, 47(4), 687-706. Deloitte (2011). The global talent challenge?getting new people in new jobs in new place Effron, M. and Shanley, J. (2011). What qualities make a world class talent management leader? In: The Talent Management Handbook, L. Berger and D. Berger (eds). McGraw?Hill, New York. Gusdorf M. (2008). Recruitment and Selection: Hiring the Right Person. USA: Society for Human Resource Management. Singh, R., Mohanty, R. (2011). Performance Appraisal Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment: Moderating Role of Employees' Cultural Values," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 4(3), 272-297. Warner, M. (2008). Reassessing human resource management with the Chinese characteristics. An overview. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(5), 771-801. Zhu, Y., Warner, M., Rowley, C. (2007). Human resource management with Asian characteristics: A hybrid people-management system in East Asia. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(5), 745-768. Kundu, S., Divya, M. Pardeep K. (2007), Human Resource Management Practices in Shipping Companies, Delhi Business Review, Vol.8, No.1