Michael Franzese `blood Covenant`

First name surnameBook ReportDateBlood Covenant1 . A brief summary of the contentThis pee up , which is actually twain account masss in one , has two principal(prenominal) parts . Book one which covers from scallywag 21 to scallywag 200 is rough Michael Franzese s flavor before his conversion to Christianity . In the first paragraph of the give-and-take , which is in page 22 of the book , the origin says To understand me and the path I took in life , it is necessary to first understand my father , informal circle enforcer John Franzese then follows a foresightful stage of his father better known as fella and his exploits or so about 1960s , this first book on franzese s life as a Mafia attraction sets the stage for the digest part of the book glossd book 2 which is carries the title The New Life in Christ . T he book athe likes of has a brief photo insert mingled with the two main parts of the bookAfter the epilogue of the book , in that location is a small section written by Camille Garcia , Franzese s wife , which is thenceforth followed by afterword then appendix 2 . Express ideas in your own words . Utilize book content , which lead support your ideas and conclusionsWhile it remains a point that thither be almost serious holes with the book in that some of the take downts cannot be pinpointed in a timeline map out , there argon noneffervescent some considerations and positive points about he book . develop two of the book fundamentally outlines the Christian life that Franzese lives and other motivational stuff like how to avoid the mafia and so on3 . Do you as the indorser buy up or rid of the compose s argument ? Do they make sense ? Do you feel they argon surgical or valid ? atomic number 18 they analytic Does the author convey himself as being presumptive t o the readerI accept the author s arguments ! .

Even though some of the elaborate argon not clear and may need validation , there is a truth to the facts and feelings of Franzese . It has been said that this book , Franzese s twinkling , is the rendition of the first , called Quitting the Mob which was published in 1992 , with some a couple of(prenominal) addition of wordsThe various issues that raise the issue of credibility to the readers are that since he stole hundreds of millions of dollars . What happened to this money , did the mob pay back it ? Why has the mob never come after him even out after testifying to the grand jury ? These are some of th e questions that are left hanging leaving the reader thinking gravely about the credibility of the story4 . Has the author included all the master(prenominal) variables or factors in his analysis ? For example , are there any inconsistencies or contradictions in his arguments ? If so , what are theyNo . the author has failed in a number of ways . Some of the adaptation that is provided by Franzese is either in the public domain or cannot be independently verified . His claim that he had met by his...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper